Journal Article

Opportunities and challenges for monitoring a recolonizing large herbivore using citizen science

Ostermann‐Miyashita, Emu‐Felicitas, Gandl, Nina, Michler, Frank‐Uwe, Hibler, Sophia, König, Hannes J., Kuemmerle, Tobias, Kiffner, Christian, Smaga, Aleksandra, Dobiáš, Kornelia, Weltgen, Leonie, Bluhm, Hendrik, Look, Samantha

2023

Overview

Monitoring is a prerequisite for evidence‐based wildlife management and conservation planning, yet conventional monitoring approaches are often ineffective for species occurring at low densities. However, some species such as large mammals are often observed by lay people and this information can be leveraged through citizen science monitoring schemes. To ensure that such wildlife monitoring efforts provide robust inferences, assessing the quantity, quality, and potential biases of citizen science data is crucial. For Eurasian moose (Alces alces), a species currently recolonizing north‐eastern Germany and occurring in very low numbers, we applied three citizen science tools: a mail/email report system, a smartphone application, and a webpage. Among these monitoring tools, the mail/email report system yielded the greatest number of moose reports in absolute and in standardized (corrected for time effort) terms. The reported moose were predominantly identified as single, adult, male individuals, and reports occurred mostly during late summer. Overlaying citizen science data with independently generated habitat suitability and connectivity maps showed that members of the public detected moose in suitable habitats but not necessarily in movement corridors. Also, moose detections were often recorded near roads, suggestive of spatial bias in the sampling effort. Our results suggest that citizen science‐based data collection can be facilitated by brief, intuitive digital reporting systems. However, inference from the resulting data can be limited due to unquantified and possibly biased sampling effort. To overcome these challenges, we offer specific recommendations such as more structured monitoring efforts involving the public in areas likely to be roamed by moose for improving quantity, quality, and analysis of citizen science‐based data for making robust inferences. Citizen science‐based monitoring approaches for moose (Alces alces) in northeast Germany have been analyzed and their characteristics and limitations have been assessed. We provide concrete technical and structural changes to overcome data collection biases and improve the quantity and quality of citizen science data.

• Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,John Wiley and Sons Inc,Wiley
• Subject: Alces alces / Bias / biodiversity monitoring / Conservation Ecology / Data collection / Demographics / Electronic mail / elk / Herbivores / human–wildlife coexistence / large‐mammal comeback / Monitoring / Moose / Participatory research / Population / Quality assessment / Robustness / Sampling / Science / Smartphones / Trends / Wildlife conservation / Wildlife management