Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Different Lepidopteran Elicitors Account for Cross-Talk in Herbivory-Induced Phytohormone Signaling
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Different Lepidopteran Elicitors Account for Cross-Talk in Herbivory-Induced Phytohormone Signaling
Do you wish to request the book?
Different Lepidopteran Elicitors Account for Cross-Talk in Herbivory-Induced Phytohormone Signaling
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Different Lepidopteran Elicitors Account for Cross-Talk in Herbivory-Induced Phytohormone Signaling
2009
Overview
Salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), and their interactions mediate plant responses to pathogen and herbivore attack. JA-SA and JA-ET cross-signaling are well studied, but little is known about SA-ET cross-signaling in plant-herbivore interactions. When the specialist herbivore tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) attacks Nicotiana attenuata, rapid and transient JA and ET bursts are elicited without significantly altering wound-induced SA levels. In contrast, attack from the generalist beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) results in comparatively lower JA and ET bursts, but amplified SA bursts. These phytohormone responses are mimicked when the species' larval oral secretions (OSSe and OSMs) are added to puncture wounds. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates elicit the JA and ET bursts, but not the SA burst. OSSe had enhanced glucose oxidase activity (but not β-glucosidase activity), which was sufficient to elicit the SA burst and attenuate the JA and ET levels. It is known that SA antagonizes JA; glucose oxidase activity and associated hydrogen peroxide also antagonizes the ET burst. We examined the OSMs-elicited SA burst in plants impaired in their ability to elicit JA (antisense [as]-lox3) and ET (inverted repeat [ir]-aco) bursts and perceive ET (35s-etr1b) after fatty acid-amino acid conjugate elicitation, which revealed that both ET and JA bursts antagonize the SA burst. Treating wild-type plants with ethephone and 1-methylcyclopropane confirmed these results and demonstrated the central role of the ET burst in suppressing the OSMs-elicited SA burst. By suppressing the SA burst, the ET burst likely facilitates unfettered JA-mediated defense activation in response to herbivores that otherwise would elicit SA.
Publisher
American Society of Plant Biologists
Subject
/ Animals
/ Beets
/ Biological and medical sciences
/ ethylene
/ Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
/ Glucose Oxidase - pharmacology
/ Hydrogen Peroxide - metabolism
/ Larva
/ Larvae
/ Leaves
/ Manduca
/ Plant Growth Regulators - metabolism
/ Plant physiology and development
/ Plants Interacting with Other Organisms
/ Signal Transduction - drug effects
/ Tobacco
