Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Bond strength of maxillofacial silicone to various three-dimensional printing resins compared to conventional substructures
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Bond strength of maxillofacial silicone to various three-dimensional printing resins compared to conventional substructures
Do you wish to request the book?
Bond strength of maxillofacial silicone to various three-dimensional printing resins compared to conventional substructures
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Bond strength of maxillofacial silicone to various three-dimensional printing resins compared to conventional substructures
2025
Overview
Background
Bonding between silicone elastomers and rigid substructures is critical to clinical success of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses. This study aimed to investigate the bond strength of silicone elastomers to conventional and alternative 3-dimensional printing resin materials and the effect of artificial aging.
Methods
The bond strength of seven resin substructure materials to a maxillofacial silicone was tested using the 180° peel test without artificial aging and after artificial aging in 14 groups. Test specimens composed of a silicone elastomer bonded to a substructure which were prepared according to ASTM D903-98 standard. A total of 70 specimens were prepared with a maxillofacial silicone bonded with a primer to substructures made of chemically polymerized clear acrylic, heat-polymerized clear acrylic and heat-polymerized pink acrylic, 3-dimensional surgical guide, 3-dimensional denture base, 3-dimensional polyetherketoneketone, and 3-dimensional polyetheretherketone resins (
n
= 10). Half of the specimens (
n
= 5 per group) were aged in an environmental chamber (Ci4400 Weather-Ometer, Atlas, Inc., USA) to assess the impact of 360 h of accelerated artificial aging. Peel bond strength values were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05). Bond failures were classified using confocal microscopy.
Results
Substructure material, artificial aging, and their interaction significantly affected peel bond strength (
p
< 0.001). Polyetherketoneketone and polyetheretherketone exhibited significantly lower mean bond strength in non-aged groups (
p
< 0.05). Within the aged groups, surgical guide and denture base resins demonstrated significantly higher bond strength (
p
< 0.05). The most common failure type was mixed (71.4%), followed by adhesive (20%), cohesive (9%).
Conclusions
Three-dimensional printed surgical guide resin and denture base resin specimens showed higher mean bond strength after artificial aging compared to commonly used conventional resin substructures and three- dimensional printed polyetherketoneketone and polyetheretherketone.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
