Journal Article

1.5 T MR-guided and daily adapted SBRT for prostate cancer: feasibility, preliminary clinical tolerability, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during treatment

Rigo, Michele, Alongi, Filippo, Giaj-Levra, Niccolò, Ricchetti, Francesco, Naccarato, Stefania, Ruggieri, Ruggero, Mazzola, Rosario, Nicosia, Luca, Figlia, Vanessa, De Simone, Antonio, Cuccia, Francesco, Sicignano, Gianluisa

2020

Overview

Background Unity Elekta is a unique magnetic resonance (MR)-linac that conjugates a 1.5 Tesla MR unit with a 7 MV flattening filter free accelerator.A prospective observational study for the clinical use of Elekta Unity is currently ongoing in our department. Herein, we present our preliminary report on the feasibility, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for localized prostate cancer (PC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods The SBRT protocol consisted of a 35 Gy schedule delivered in 5 fractions within 2 weeks. Toxicity and quality of life (QoL) were assessed at baseline and after treatment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS), ICIQ-SF, IIEF-5, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 and PR-25 questionnaires. Results Between October 2019 and January 2020, 25 patients with localized PC were recruited. The median age was 68 years (range, 54–82); 4 were low risk, 11 favorable intermediate risk (IR) and 10 unfavorable IR. Median iPSA was 6.8 ng/ml (range, 1–19), and 9 of these patients (36%) received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. Median prostate volume was 36 cc (range, 20–61); median baseline IPSS was 5 (range, 0–10). Median time for fraction was 53 min (range, 34–86); adaptive strategy with daily critical structure and target re-contouring and daily replanning (adapt to shape) was performed in all cases. No grade ≥ 3 adverse event was observed, three patients (12%) reported grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity (urinary frequency, urinary tract pain and urinary retention), while only one patient reported mild rectal pain. No relevant deteriorations were reported in PROMs. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experience reporting feasibility, clinician-reported outcome measurements, and PROMs for 1.5 T MR-guided adaptive SBRT for localized prostate cancer. The preliminary data collected here report optimal safety and excellent tolerability, as also confirmed by PROMs questionnaires. Moreover, the data on technical feasibility and timing of online daily adapted planning and delivery are promising. More mature data are warranted. Trial registration Date of approval April 2019 and numbered MRI/LINAC n°23,748.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Adaptive radiotherapy / Aged / Aged, 80 and over / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Biomedicine / Bladder / Cancer Research / Cancer therapies / Care and treatment / Clinical Radiation Oncology / Contouring / Delivery scheduling / Deprivation / Development and progression / Diagnostic imaging / Feasibility / Gastrointestinal diseases / Health aspects / Humans / Imaging / Magnetic resonance imaging / Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods / Male / Metastasis / Methods / Middle Aged / MRI-guided radiotherapy / Oncology / Pain / Patient outcomes / Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Patients / Planning / Prognosis / Proms (Parties) / Prospective Studies / Prostate cancer / Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology / Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery / Public relations / QoL / Quality of Life / Questionnaires / Radiation therapy / Radiology / Radiosurgery - methods / Radiotherapy / Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods / Rectum / SBRT / Schedules / Simulation / Surgery / Surveys and Questionnaires / Terminology / Terms and phrases / Time / Toxicity / Urinary incontinence / Urinary tract