Journal Article

Anticoagulation options for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yang, Yingying, Wang, Fang, Zhang, Ling, Fu, Ping, Zhou, Zhifeng, Liu, Chen

2023

Overview

Background Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a widely used standard therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Despite its effectiveness, treatment is often interrupted due to clot formation in the extracorporeal circuits. Anticoagulation is a crucial strategy for preventing extracorporeal circuit clotting during CRRT. While various anticoagulation options are available, there were still no studies synthetically comparing the efficacy and safety of these anticoagulation options. Methods Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database) were searched from inception to October 31, 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the following outcomes were included: filter lifespan, all-cause mortality, length of stay, duration of CRRT, recovery of kidney function, adverse events and costs. Results Thirty-seven RCTs from 38 articles, comprising 2648 participants with 14 comparisons, were included in this network meta-analysis (NMA). Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) are the most frequently used anticoagulants. Compared to UFH, RCA was found to be more effective in prolonging filter lifespan (MD 12.0, 95% CI 3.8 to 20.2) and reducing the risk of bleeding. Regional-UFH plus Prostaglandin I2 (Regional-UFH + PGI2) appeared to outperform RCA (MD 37.0, 95% CI 12.0 to 62.0), LMWH (MD 41.3, 95% CI 15.6 to 67.0), and other evaluated anticoagulation options in prolonging filter lifespan. However, only a single included RCT with 46 participants had evaluated Regional-UFH + PGI2. No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of length of ICU stay, all-cause mortality, duration of CRRT, recovery of kidney function, and adverse events among most evaluated anticoagulation options. Conclusions Compared to UFH, RCA is the preferred anticoagulant for critically ill patients requiring CRRT. The SUCRA analysis and forest plot of Regional-UFH + PGI2 are limited, as only a single study was included. Additional high-quality studies are necessary before any recommendation of Regional-UFH + PGI2. Further larger high-quality RCTs are desirable to strengthen the evidence on the best choice of anticoagulation options to reduce all-cause mortality and adverse events and promote the recovery of kidney function. Trial registration The protocol of this network meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO ( CRD42022360263 ). Registered 26 September 2022.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Acute kidney injury / Acute Kidney Injury - etiology / Acute renal failure / Anticoagulants / Anticoagulants (Medicine) / Anticoagulants - therapeutic use / Anticoagulation / Bias / Care and treatment / Circuits / Citrates / Citric Acid - therapeutic use / Clinical trials / Continuous renal replacement therapy / Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy - adverse effects / Costs / Critical care / Critical Care Medicine / Critical Illness - therapy / Critically ill / Dosage and administration / Emergency Medicine / Filter lifespan / Hemodialysis / Hemodynamics / Heparin - therapeutic use / Humans / Intensive / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Meta-analysis / Mortality / Network meta-analysis / Peritoneal dialysis / Prevention / Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Renal replacement therapy / Renal Replacement Therapy - methods / Risk factors / Systematic review