Journal Article

Awareness and willingness to use HIV pre‐exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Holland, Paula, Ngin, Chanrith, Tuot, Sovannary, Choub, Sok Chamreun, Pal, Khoundyla, Mburu, Gitau, Yi, Siyan, Igbinedion, Ewemade, Mwai, Grace W, Chhim, Kolab

2017

Overview

Introduction: To facilitate provision of pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC), a better understanding of potential demand and user preferences is required. This review assessed awareness and willingness to use oral PrEP among men who have sex with men (MSM) in LMIC. Methods: Electronic literature search of Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed, PsychINFO, CINHAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted between July and September 2016. Reference lists of relevant studies were searched, and three authors contacted for additional data. Non‐peer reviewed publications were excluded. Studies were screened for inclusion, and relevant data ed, assessed for bias, and synthesized. Results: In total, 2186 records were identified, of which 23 studies involving 14,040 MSM from LMIC were included. The proportion of MSM who were aware of PrEP was low at 29.7% (95% CI: 16.9–44.3). However, the proportion willing to use PrEP was higher, at 64.4% (95% CI: 53.3–74.8). Proportions of MSM aware of PrEP was <50% in 11 studies and 50–70% in 3 studies, while willingness to use PrEP was <50% in 6 studies, 50–70% in 9 studies, and over 80% in 5 studies. Several factors affected willingness to use PrEP. At the individual domain, poor knowledge of PrEP, doubts about its effectiveness, fear of side effects, low perception of HIV risk, and the need to adhere or take medicines frequently reduced willingness to use PrEP, while PrEP education and motivation to maintain good health were facilitators of potential use. Demographic factors (education, age, and migration) influenced both awareness and willingness to use PrEP, but their effects were not consistent across studies. At the social domain, anticipated stigma from peers, partners, and family members related to sexual orientation, PrEP, or HIV status were barriers to potential use of PrEP, while partner, peer, and family support were facilitators of potential use. At the structural domain, concerns regarding attitudes of healthcare providers, quality assurance, data protection, and cost were determinants of potential use. Conclusions: This review found that despite low levels of awareness of PrEP, MSM in LMIC are willing to use it if they are supported appropriately to deal with a range of individual, social, and structural barriers.

• Publisher: International AIDS Society,John Wiley & Sons, Inc,Taylor & Francis
• Subject: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome / Adult / AIDS / Anti-HIV Agents - therapeutic use / Antiretroviral drugs / Awareness / Bias / Clinical trials / Developing countries / Disease prevention / Drug therapy / Education / Grounded theory / Handbooks / Health aspects / Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice / Health promotion / Health risks / HIV / HIV infection / HIV Infections - drug therapy / Homosexuality, Male / Human immunodeficiency virus / Humans / Income / Infections / low and middle income countries / Male / Medication Adherence / men who have sex with men (MSM) / Meta-analysis / MSM (Men who have sex with men) / Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis / Prevention / pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) / Qualitative research / Quality assurance / Review / Sexual Partners / Sexually transmitted diseases / Socioeconomic Factors / STD / Studies / Systematic review / Transgender persons / Womens health