Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Assessment of in vitro particle dosimetry models at the single cell and particle level by scanning electron microscopy
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Assessment of in vitro particle dosimetry models at the single cell and particle level by scanning electron microscopy
Do you wish to request the book?
Assessment of in vitro particle dosimetry models at the single cell and particle level by scanning electron microscopy
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Assessment of in vitro particle dosimetry models at the single cell and particle level by scanning electron microscopy
2018
Overview
Background
Particokinetic models are important to predict the effective cellular dose, which is key to understanding the interactions of particles with biological systems. For the reliable establishment of dose–response curves in, e.g., the field of pharmacology and toxicology, mostly the In vitro Sedimentation, Diffusion and Dosimetry (ISDD) and Distorted Grid (DG) models have been employed. Here, we used high resolution scanning electron microscopy to quantify deposited numbers of particles on cellular and intercellular surfaces and compare experimental findings with results predicted by the ISDD and DG models.
Results
Exposure of human lung epithelial A549 cells to various concentrations of differently sized silica particles (100, 200 and 500 nm) revealed a remarkably higher dose deposited on intercellular regions compared to cellular surfaces. The ISDD and DG models correctly predicted the areal densities of particles in the intercellular space when a high adsorption (“stickiness”) to the surface was emulated. In contrast, the lower dose on cells was accurately inferred by the DG model in the case of “non-sticky” boundary conditions. Finally, the presence of cells seemed to enhance particle deposition, as aerial densities on cell-free substrates were clearly reduced.
Conclusions
Our results further validate the use of particokinetic models but also demonstrate their limitations, specifically, with respect to the spatial distribution of particles on heterogeneous surfaces. Consideration of surface properties with respect to adhesion and desorption should advance modelling approaches to ultimately predict the cellular dose with higher precision.
Publisher
BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
Subject
