MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection
Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection
Journal Article

Impairment of neck and shoulder function after neck dissection: a comparative study of goniometry, EMG and paper pencil tool in a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving verses conventional neck dissection

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Surgical management of oral cancer poses significant challenges due to the proximity of critical nerves, like spinal accessory, which increases the risk of inadvertent damage or neuropraxia during surgery. Methods A randomized controlled trial enrolled 32 patients with histologically confirmed oral cavity carcinoma and clinically and radiologically negative cervical neck nodes. Patients were assigned to either level IIb-preserving or conventional selective neck dissection. Shoulder function was evaluated using goniometry, electromyography (EMG), and the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII). Outcomes from these three assessment methods were compared. Results Both groups exhibited impaired spinal accessory nerve function. In the IIb-preserving group, EMG detected impairment in 50% of patients, compared to 95% in the control group. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups across all three assessment methods. However, EMG and goniometry indicated functional recovery at 6 and 12 months, whereas NDII scores remained significantly different at 12 months, despite full nerve recovery observed on EMG and goniometry. Conclusions The study demonstrates agreement between shoulder function measurements (goniometry and EMG) but discordance with NDII. This discrepancy may arise from the distinct constructs used by NDII to assess neck dissection impairment, highlighting potential limitations in its sensitivity to functional recovery.