Journal Article

Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation – an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri

Holderegger, Rolf, Fischer, Martin C., Shimizu, Kentaro K., Leuzinger, Marianne, Rellstab, Christian, Roumet, Marie, Gugerli, Felix, Widmer, Alex

2017

Overview

Background Microsatellite markers are widely used for estimating genetic diversity within and differentiation among populations. However, it has rarely been tested whether such estimates are useful proxies for genome-wide patterns of variation and differentiation. Here, we compared microsatellite variation with genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to assess and quantify potential marker-specific biases and derive recommendations for future studies. Overall, we genotyped 180 Arabidopsis halleri individuals from nine populations using 20 microsatellite markers. Twelve of these markers were originally developed for Arabidopsis thaliana (cross-species markers) and eight for A. halleri (species-specific markers). We further characterized 2 million SNPs across the genome with a pooled whole-genome re-sequencing approach (Pool-Seq). Results Our analyses revealed that estimates of genetic diversity and differentiation derived from cross-species and species-specific microsatellites differed substantially and that expected microsatellite heterozygosity (SSR- H e ) was not significantly correlated with genome-wide SNP diversity estimates (SNP- H e and θ Watterson ) in A. halleri . Instead, microsatellite allelic richness ( A r ) was a better proxy for genome-wide SNP diversity. Estimates of genetic differentiation among populations ( F ST ) based on both marker types were correlated, but microsatellite-based estimates were significantly larger than those from SNPs. Possible causes include the limited number of microsatellite markers used, marker ascertainment bias, as well as the high variance in microsatellite-derived estimates. In contrast, genome-wide SNP data provided unbiased estimates of genetic diversity independent of whether genome- or only exome-wide SNPs were used. Further, we inferred that a few thousand random SNPs are sufficient to reliably estimate genome-wide diversity and to distinguish among populations differing in genetic variation. Conclusions We recommend that future analyses of genetic diversity within and differentiation among populations use randomly selected high-throughput sequencing-based SNP data to draw conclusions on genome-wide diversity patterns. In species comparable to A. halleri , a few thousand SNPs are sufficient to achieve this goal.

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Analysis / Animal Genetics and Genomics / Arabidopsis / Arabidopsis - genetics / Arabidopsis halleri / Biological diversity / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Deoxyribonucleic acid / Differentiation / DNA / Empirical analysis / Estimates / Estimation / Evolutionary biology / Gene sequencing / Genetic analysis / Genetic aspects / Genetic diversity / Genetic markers / Genetic research / Genome, Plant - genetics / Genomes / Genomics / Heterozygosity / Identification and classification / Life Sciences / Markers / Microarrays / Microbial Genetics and Genomics / Microsatellite Repeats - genetics / Microsatellites / Microsatellites (Genetics) / Mutation / Next-generation sequencing / Nucleotides / Plant Genetics and Genomics / Plant genomics / Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Population / Population differentiation / Population genetics / Populations / Proteomics / Research Article / Single nucleotide polymorphisms / Single-nucleotide polymorphism / Species / Species diversity / Wildlife conservation