MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting
A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting
A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting
A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting
Journal Article

A Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term efficacy and safety in a resource-limited setting

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery (NCRS) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) based on three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma in a resource-limited setting. The clinical outcomes and incidence of complications in 137 patients who underwent NCRS with those of 163 patients who CCRT based on 3DCRT were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match the two groups to enable further statistical comparisons. Survival analysis was performed utilizing Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests. Furthermore, the incidence of complications between the two groups was also compared using chi-squared tests. PSM analysis identified 103 matched pairs of patients. The NCRS and CCRT groups exhibited 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 85.4% and 91.2%, respectively (p=0.19). Additionally, the NCRS and CCRT groups exhibited 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 76.7% and 89.3% (p=0.02), and the recurrence rates were 20.4% and 9.7% (p=0.03), respectively. However, the CCRT group exhibited a higher incidence of early any-grade complications (79.6% vs 35.9%, p<0.001) and early grade 3 complications (15.5% vs 2.9%, p=0.002) compared to the NCRS group. In terms of overall late complications, there was no significant difference in the incidence between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that stage IIA2 emerged as an independent risk factor for OS (aHR 8.89; p=0.033). Moreover, histologic grade 2-3 (aHR 5.3; p=0.022), stage IIA2 (aHR 2.95; p=0.043), NCRS treatment (aHR 2.41; p=0.012) were identified as independent risk factors for DFS. In resource-limited settings, for patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 cervical squamous cell carcinoma, 3DCRT-based CCRT offers superior disease-free survival and reduced recurrence rates compared to NCRS, despite increased early complication rates.