MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD
Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD
Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD
Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD
Journal Article

Minimally invasive surgery and neurophysiological monitoring for brainstem hemorrhage: Advancing predictive models with qEEG and TCD

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Primary brainstem hemorrhage (PBSH) is a life-threatening neurological condition associated with high mortality and disability rates. Stereotactic hematoma aspiration surgery has been explored as a treatment option, and postoperative brainstem function monitoring is considered important for patient management. This study aimed to evaluate the integration of minimally invasive stereotactic aspiration surgery with quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring to assess brain function and improve predictive models for clinical outcomes in PBSH patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 34 PBSH patients admitted between December 2022 and October 2023. After applying exclusion criteria, 25 eligible patients underwent stereotactic aspiration surgery within 24-48 hours of symptom onset. Both qEEG and TCD monitoring were performed preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively. Changes in qEEG parameters and TCD-derived hemodynamic indices were analyzed to assess surgical safety and efficacy. Stereotactic surgery was associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes at 90 days compared with the non-surgical group (68.75% vs. 11.11%, p = 0.01). Postoperative TCD parameters improved significantly, indicating better hemodynamic stability, though no correlation with mRS scores was found. qEEG analysis showed significant correlations between RBP δ% and mRS scores (ρ = 0.480, p = 0.015), and RBP α% (ρ = -0.456, p = 0.022). aEEG also correlated strongly with 90-day mRS scores (ρ = 0.544, p = 0.004). The combined model of hematoma volume, RBP α%, and aEEG showed the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.865). This study suggests the prognostic value of qEEG and explores the utility of combining neurophysiological monitoring with stereotactic aspiration surgery. The integration of these tools may assist in prognostic assessment for PBSH patients; however, validation in larger prospective studies is required before clinical adoption.