Journal Article

A prophylactic multivalent vaccine against different filovirus species is immunogenic and provides protection from lethal infections with Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus species in non-human primates

Mire, Chad E., Patterson, Jean L., Giavedoni, Luis D., Rodriguez, Ariane, Callendret, Benoit, Custers, Jerome, Grazia Pau, Maria, Steigerwald, Robin, Schuitemaker, Hanneke, Vellinga, Jort, Weijtens, Mo, Geisbert, Thomas W., Hooper, Jay W., Volkmann, Ariane, Zahn, Roland, Wunderlich, Kerstin, Hartkoorn-Pasma, Jutta, Brasel, Trevor, Dirmeier, Ulrike, Carrion, Ricardo, Cheminay, Cedric

2018

Overview

The search for a universal filovirus vaccine that provides protection against multiple filovirus species has been prompted by sporadic but highly lethal outbreaks of Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus infections. A good prophylactic vaccine should be able to provide protection to all known filovirus species and as an upside potentially protect from newly emerging virus strains. We investigated the immunogenicity and protection elicited by multivalent vaccines expressing glycoproteins (GP) from Ebola virus (EBOV), Sudan virus (SUDV), Taï Forest virus (TAFV) and Marburg virus (MARV). Immune responses against filovirus GP have been associated with protection from disease. The GP antigens were expressed by adenovirus serotypes 26 and 35 (Ad26 and Ad35) and modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) vectors, all selected for their strong immunogenicity and good safety profile. Using fully lethal NHP intramuscular challenge models, we assessed different vaccination regimens for immunogenicity and protection from filovirus disease. Heterologous multivalent Ad26-Ad35 prime-boost vaccination regimens could give full protection against MARV (range 75%-100% protection) and EBOV (range 50% to 100%) challenge, and partial protection (75%) against SUDV challenge. Heterologous multivalent Ad26-MVA prime-boost immunization gave full protection against EBOV challenge in a small cohort study. The use of such multivalent vaccines did not show overt immune interference in comparison with monovalent vaccines. Multivalent vaccines induced GP-specific antibody responses and cellular IFNγ responses to each GP expressed by the vaccine, and cross-reactivity to TAFV GP was detected in a trivalent vaccine expressing GP from EBOV, SUDV and MARV. In the EBOV challenge studies, higher humoral EBOV GP-specific immune responses (p = 0.0004) were associated with survival from EBOV challenge and less so for cellular immune responses (p = 0.0320). These results demonstrate that it is feasible to generate a multivalent filovirus vaccine that can protect against lethal infection by multiple members of the filovirus family.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Analysis / Animal models / Animals / Antigens / Biology and Life Sciences / Cell survival / Control / Cross-reactivity / Diseases and pests / Distribution / Ebola virus / Ebolavirus / Ebolavirus - immunology / Epidemics / Female / Filoviridae / Glycoproteins / Health aspects / Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - prevention & control / Immune response / Immune response (cell-mediated) / Immune response (humoral) / Immunization / Immunogenicity / Infections / Macaca fascicularis / Male / Marburg virus disease / Marburg Virus Disease - prevention & control / Marburgvirus / Marburgvirus - immunology / Medicine and Health Sciences / Mortality / Outbreaks / Pest outbreaks / Physiological aspects / Prevention / Primates / Protection and preservation / Research and Analysis Methods / Serotypes / Species / Vaccines / Viral diseases / Viral vaccines / Viral Vaccines - immunology / Viruses / γ-Interferon