Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Adenosine deaminase for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Adenosine deaminase for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
Adenosine deaminase for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Adenosine deaminase for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2019
Overview
Pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a useful diagnostic test for tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE), but its exact threshold and accuracy in clinical decision-making is unclear. We aimed to assess diagnostic performance of ADA in TPE and to clarify its optimal diagnostic threshold.
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles indexed up to October 2018. We included English language studies that provided both sensitivity and specificity of ADA in TPE diagnosis. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity were obtained through bivariate random effects model, both overall and at prespecified threshold ranges of <36, 40±4, 45-65 and >65 IU/L.
We retrieved 2162 citations, and included 174 publications with 27009 patients. All studies showed high risk of bias. Summary sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio estimates were 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) and 97.42 (95% CI 74.90-126.72) respectively. 65 studies with ADA threshold of 40±4 IU/L showed summary sensitivity and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.91) respectively. Four studies with ADA threshold >65 IU/L showed summary sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.61-0.96) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.80-0.99) respectively.
ADA levels in pleural fluid show good diagnostic accuracy in diagnosis of TPE; however, all included studies showed high risk of bias. It was not possible to derive any firm inference on relative clinical utility of different diagnostic thresholds.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.