Journal Article

Ground-based Multi-AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations of NO2 and H2CO at Kinshasa and comparisons with TROPOMI observations

Rodriguez, Yombo Phaka, Mahieu, Emmanuel, Fayt, Caroline, Stavrakou, Trissevgeni, Jacobs, Lars, Pinardi, Gaia, De Smedt, Isabelle, Hendrick, François, Müller, Jean-François, Dimitropoulou, Ermioni, Djibi, Buenimio Lomami, Richard Bopili Mbotia Lepiba, Michel Van Roozendael, Friedrich, Martina M, Jean-Pierre Mbungu Tsumbu, Phuati, Edmond Phuku, Merlaud, Alexis

2023

Overview

We present a database of MAX-DOAS (Multi-AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) ground-based observations of NO2 and H2CO tropospheric vertical column densities (VCDtropo) performed for the first time in the city of Kinshasa. These measurements were conducted between November 2019 and July 2021 and processed using the standardized inversion tools developed in the ESA FRM4DOAS (Fiducial Reference Measurements for Ground-Based DOAS Air-Quality Observations) project. The retrieved geophysical quantities are used to validate column observations from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) over Kinshasa. In the validation, we experiment with three different comparison cases of increasing complexity. In the first case, a direct comparison between MAX-DOAS observations (hourly average of MAX-DOAS VCDtropo at overpass) and TROPOMI shows an underestimation of TROPOMI with a median bias of -38 % for NO2 and -39 % for H2CO based on monthly comparison. The second case takes into account the different vertical sensitivities of the two instruments and the a priori profile. We note significant changes in the median bias for both compounds: -12 % for NO2 and +11 % for H2CO. The third case builds on the second case by considering also the direction of sight of the MAX-DOAS. For this third case, we find a median bias of +44 % for NO2 and a median bias of +4 % for H2CO. However this case is impacted by low sampling and is considered less reliable. The findings from this study underscore the significance of employing a realistic a priori profile in TROPOMI column extraction, particularly within heavily polluted urban zones like Kinshasa. The investigation also highlights the necessity for prudence when integrating the MAX-DOAS line of sight due to the noise generated during subsampling and the limited horizontal sensitivity of MAX-DOAS observations. Importantly, the study further reveals the pronounced pollution levels of NO2, H2CO and aerosols in both the city of Kinshasa and its adjacent regions, underscoring the imperative for consistent monitoring and effective regulatory measures by local authorities.

• Publisher: Copernicus GmbH,Copernicus Gesellschaften,Copernicus Publications
• Subject: Absorption spectroscopy / Aerosols / Air pollution / Air quality / Air quality measurements / Analytical methods / Automation / Bias / Cities / Datasets / Dry season / Emissions / Ground-based observation / MAX-DOAS, KINSHASA, NO2, H2CO, TROPOMI / Monitoring / Monitoring instruments / Nitrogen dioxide / Outdoor air quality / Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences / Physics / Physique / Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre / Pollution levels / Sensitivity / Spectroscopy / Spectrum analysis / Traffic / Troposphere / VOCs / Volatile organic compounds