MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal Article

Safety outcomes of statin vs non-statin lipid-lowering interventions in patients with prior statin-associated muscle symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) are an obstacle in the prevention of cardiovascular events. A systematic assessment of the evidence of interventions in the setting of SAMS is lacking. To assess the evidence of strategies of statin-based vs non-statin based therapies in patients with a history of SAMS. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov and Proquest databases were searched from inception up to February 2024.We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies involving patients with history of prior SAMS, comparing statin-based therapy to a comparator. We followed the PRISMA guideline with multiple authors involved at each stage. A random-effect model was used in the meta-analysis. We defined the primary outcome as incidence of muscle symptoms. The secondary outcomes were proportion of statin discontinuation of statin-based therapy within patients with history of SAMS. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020202619). In 23 studies (13 RCTs, 2 prospective and 8 retrospective studies) there were in total 1868 participants in RCTs and 47'628 participants in non-RCTs (follow-up 12 weeks - 31 months). Our confidence in the body of evidence using GRADE was moderate for the primary outcome and low-moderate for the secondary outcome. In RCTs among patients with history of SAMS, there was high heterogeneity in the statin regimens and controls (placebo/non-daily dosing/ezetimibe/PCSK9 inhibitors). In RCTs, the meta-analysis showed no difference between statin-based and control groups in the incidence of muscle symptoms (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.86-1.64, I2: 46.3%)). Therapy discontinuation due to muscle symptoms in RCTs was higher in the statin-based than the comparator groups (OR 1.48, 95%CI 1.03-2.12, I2 = 17.6%). Our findings suggest that patients with a history of SAMS can be re-challenged with statins. More high-quality evidence is needed to strengthen guidelines regarding the management of SAMS.