Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
CORPORATE POLITICAL SPEECH: WHO DECIDES?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
CORPORATE POLITICAL SPEECH: WHO DECIDES?
Do you wish to request the book?
CORPORATE POLITICAL SPEECH: WHO DECIDES?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
CORPORATE POLITICAL SPEECH: WHO DECIDES?
2010
Overview
The Supreme Court spoke clearly this Term on the issue of corporate political speech, concluding in 'Citizens United v. FEC' that the First Amendment protects corporations' freedom to spend corporate funds on indirect support of political candidates. Constitutional law scholars will long debate the wisdom of that holding, as do the authors of the two other Comments in this issue. In contrast, this Comment accepts as given that corporations may not be limited from spending money on politics should they decide to speak. We focus in-stead on an important question left unanswered by Citizens United: who should have the power to decide whether a corporation will engage in political speech?
