Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections
by
Kedar, Orit
in
Bargaining
/ Bargaining power
/ Coefficients
/ Competition
/ Decision Making
/ Democracy
/ Democratic theory
/ Election results
/ Elections
/ Electoral behaviour
/ Electoral systems
/ Empirical tests
/ Ideology
/ Institutionalization
/ Irrigation
/ Legislative Bodies
/ Measurement Techniques
/ Modeling
/ Motivation
/ Opinions
/ Parliamentary elections
/ Parliamentary elections-UK
/ Parliaments
/ Plurality voting
/ Political institutions
/ Political Parties
/ Political science
/ Political systems
/ Politics
/ Polities
/ Power distribution
/ Power-sharing
/ Preferences
/ Proximity
/ Radical parties
/ Strategies
/ Theory
/ Voter behavior
/ Voters
/ Voting
/ Voting Behavior
/ Voting behaviour
2005
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections
by
Kedar, Orit
in
Bargaining
/ Bargaining power
/ Coefficients
/ Competition
/ Decision Making
/ Democracy
/ Democratic theory
/ Election results
/ Elections
/ Electoral behaviour
/ Electoral systems
/ Empirical tests
/ Ideology
/ Institutionalization
/ Irrigation
/ Legislative Bodies
/ Measurement Techniques
/ Modeling
/ Motivation
/ Opinions
/ Parliamentary elections
/ Parliamentary elections-UK
/ Parliaments
/ Plurality voting
/ Political institutions
/ Political Parties
/ Political science
/ Political systems
/ Politics
/ Polities
/ Power distribution
/ Power-sharing
/ Preferences
/ Proximity
/ Radical parties
/ Strategies
/ Theory
/ Voter behavior
/ Voters
/ Voting
/ Voting Behavior
/ Voting behaviour
2005
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections
by
Kedar, Orit
in
Bargaining
/ Bargaining power
/ Coefficients
/ Competition
/ Decision Making
/ Democracy
/ Democratic theory
/ Election results
/ Elections
/ Electoral behaviour
/ Electoral systems
/ Empirical tests
/ Ideology
/ Institutionalization
/ Irrigation
/ Legislative Bodies
/ Measurement Techniques
/ Modeling
/ Motivation
/ Opinions
/ Parliamentary elections
/ Parliamentary elections-UK
/ Parliaments
/ Plurality voting
/ Political institutions
/ Political Parties
/ Political science
/ Political systems
/ Politics
/ Polities
/ Power distribution
/ Power-sharing
/ Preferences
/ Proximity
/ Radical parties
/ Strategies
/ Theory
/ Voter behavior
/ Voters
/ Voting
/ Voting Behavior
/ Voting behaviour
2005
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections
Journal Article
When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections
2005
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
This work develops and tests a theory of voter choice in parliamentary elections. I demonstrate that voters are concerned with policy outcomes and hence incorporate the way institutions convert votes to policy into their choices. Since policy is often the result of institutionalized multiparty bargaining and thus votes are watered down by power-sharing, voters often compensate for this watering-down by supporting parties whose positions differ from (and are often more extreme than) their own. I use this insight to reinterpret an ongoing debate between proximity and directional theories of voting, showing that voters prefer parties whose positions differ from their own views insofar as these parties pull policy in a desired direction. Utilizing data from four parliamentary democracies that vary in their institutional design, I test my theory and show how institutional context affects voter behavior.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.