Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Gender identity, inter-team competition and leader self-efficacy developmental trajectories in a multi-institutional leader development program
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Gender identity, inter-team competition and leader self-efficacy developmental trajectories in a multi-institutional leader development program
Do you wish to request the book?
Gender identity, inter-team competition and leader self-efficacy developmental trajectories in a multi-institutional leader development program
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Gender identity, inter-team competition and leader self-efficacy developmental trajectories in a multi-institutional leader development program
2024
Overview
PurposeThis study analyzed three years of data from the Collegiate Leadership Competition to investigate potential differences in longitudinal leader self-efficacy growth between students who identify as men and those who identify as women.Design/methodology/approachSurvey design.FindingsResults indicate that women participants enter their competition experience at higher levels of leader self-efficacy than men and that both groups were able to sustain moderate levels of growth measured several months after the end of the competition.Originality/valueThe gap between men and women in their leader self-efficacy did not change over the several months of measurement. Implications for leadership educators are discussed.
