Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Comparison of the Reliability of Self-Reported Drug Use and Sexual Behaviors Using Computer-Assisted Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Comparison of the Reliability of Self-Reported Drug Use and Sexual Behaviors Using Computer-Assisted Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing
Do you wish to request the book?
A Comparison of the Reliability of Self-Reported Drug Use and Sexual Behaviors Using Computer-Assisted Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Comparison of the Reliability of Self-Reported Drug Use and Sexual Behaviors Using Computer-Assisted Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing
2000
Overview
The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of responses to HIV risk behavior questions obtained using a voice-enhanced, computer-administered self-interview (audio-CASI) system with touch-screen response compared with those obtained via face-to-face interviews administered by trained and experienced interviewers. Additionally, the study assessed bias that may be attributable to an audio-CASI data collection format. The design of the study was a four-group crossover design with random assignment to one of four study conditions: (a) audio-CASI interview at both intake and retest, (b) face-to-face interview at both intake and retest, (c) audio-CASI interview at intake and face-to-face interview at retest, and (d) face-to-face interview at intake and audio-CASI interview at retest. The study was conducted with a sample of drug users at risk for HIV infection interviewed in nonclinical settings. Data were collected at intake and 48 hours after intake. Analyses show that data obtained using voice-enhanced computer interviewing with touch-screen response are reliable and are comparable to data obtained using interviewer administered face-to-face interviews. However, bias was found to be associated with data collection format and may be parti ally attributable to the complexity of the questionnaire.
Publisher
Guilford,Guilford Press
Subject
/ Aged
/ Bias
/ Biological and medical sciences
/ computer-assisted self-interviews
/ Drug Use
/ Drugs
/ Female
/ HIV
/ Human immunodeficiency virus
/ Humans
/ Interviews as Topic - methods
/ Male
/ Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
/ Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data
/ Sexually transmitted diseases
/ STD
/ Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology
/ Substance-Related Disorders - urine
