Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Spatiotemporal Exposure Assessment of PM2.5 Concentration Using a Sensor-Based Air Monitoring System
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Spatiotemporal Exposure Assessment of PM2.5 Concentration Using a Sensor-Based Air Monitoring System
Do you wish to request the book?
Spatiotemporal Exposure Assessment of PM2.5 Concentration Using a Sensor-Based Air Monitoring System
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Spatiotemporal Exposure Assessment of PM2.5 Concentration Using a Sensor-Based Air Monitoring System
2024
Overview
Sensor-based air monitoring instruments (SAMIs) can provide high-resolution air quality data by offering a detailed mapping of areas that air quality monitoring stations (AQMSs) cannot reach. This enhances the precision of estimating PM2.5 concentration levels for areas that have not been directly measured, thereby enabling an accurate assessment of exposure. The study period was from 30 September to 2 October 2019 in the Guro-gu district, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Four models were applied to assess the suitability of the SAMIs and visualize the temporal and spatial distribution of PM2.5. Assuming that the PM2.5 concentrations measured at a SAMI located in the center of the Guro-gu district represent the true values, the PM2.5 concentrations estimated using QGIS spatial interpolation techniques were compared. The SAMIs were used at seven points (S1–S7) according to the distance. Models 3 and 4 accurately estimated the unmeasured points with higher coefficients of determination (R2) than the other models. As the distance from the AQMS increased from S1 to S7, the R2 between the observed and estimated values decreased from 0.89 to 0.29, respectively. The auxiliary installation of SAMIs could resolve regional concentration imbalances, allowing for the accurate estimation of pollutant concentrations and improved risk assessment for the population.
