Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The Ecophysiological Response of Olive Trees under Different Fruit Loads
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The Ecophysiological Response of Olive Trees under Different Fruit Loads
Do you wish to request the book?
The Ecophysiological Response of Olive Trees under Different Fruit Loads
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The Ecophysiological Response of Olive Trees under Different Fruit Loads
2024
Overview
Olive trees have a unique reproductive pattern marked by biennial fruiting. This study examined the repercussions of alternate fruit bearing on the water relations of olive trees and the associated ecophysiological mechanisms. The experiment spanned two consecutive years: the “ON” year, characterized by a high crop load, and the “OFF” year, marked by minimal fruit production. Key ecophysiological parameters, including sap flow, stomatal conductance, and photosynthetic rate, were monitored in both years. Pre-dawn water potential was measured using continuous stem psychrometers and the pressure chamber technique. Biochemical analyses focused on non-structural carbohydrate concentrations (starch, sucrose, and mannitol) and olive leaves’ carbon-stable isotope ratio (δ13C). Results revealed a higher leaf gas exchange rate during the “ON” year, leading to an average 29.3% increase in water consumption and a 40.78% rise in the photosynthetic rate. Higher water usage during the “ON” year resulted in significantly lower (43.22% on average) leaf water potential. Sucrose and starch concentrations were also increased in the “ON” year, while there were no significant differences in mannitol concentration. Regarding the carbon-stable isotope ratio, leaves from the “OFF” year exhibited significantly higher δ13C values, suggesting a higher resistance to the CO2 pathway from the atmosphere to carboxylation sites compared to the “ON” year plants.
