Journal Article

Development of a checklist for cognitive assessment requirements (CARE) based on a Delphi consensus study

Jansen, Petra, Kochan, Nicole A, Stern, Yaakov, Woods, Steven Paul, Posner, Michael I., Borhani, Khatereh, Berry, Jacquelyn H, Gonzalez, Raul, Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent, Barker-Collo, Suzanne, Golden, Charles J, Hollon, Steven D, Bell, Morris, Piguet, Olivier, Scholey, Andrew, Balota, David A, Rourke, Sean B., Estaji, Reza, Van Patten, Ryan, Grafman, Jordan Henry, Nejati, Vahid, Feinstein, Anthony, Raskin, Sarah A, Cullum, Munro

2025

Overview

Situational factors can influence cognitive performance and should be considered for conducting cognitive assessments. The objective of this project was to develop a checklist for Cognitive Assessment Requirements (CARE) to identify these situational factors before conducting cognitive assessments and account for them. This study employed a four-round Delphi approach involving 22 experts to identify situational factors that can impact cognitive assessment results. The development of a robust and well-balanced checklist was guided by a consensus-driven approach, which considered metrics such as Interquartile Deviation (IQD) (> 1.00), Percentage of Positive Responses (PPR, above 60%), and mean importance ratings (< 3 on a 5-point Likert scale) to assess both degree of agreement and item importance. Consensus was reached, leading to a 14-item checklist to evaluate cognitive assessment requirements. These items were categorized into six groups: Acute Illness or Physical Discomfort, Medication Effects and Substance Use, Sleep Quality and Fatigue, Emotional State, Language factors, and Environmental factors. The CARE can be employed prior to cognitive assessments to identify situational factors of relevance to the individual client, thereby creating a more favorable environment for cognitive evaluation, and enhancing the reliability of the assessment findings. Furthermore, the CARE can help determine the level of confidence in the results by assessing whether the conditions are conducive to testing or if situational factors may undermine the validity of the evaluation.

• Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK,Nature Publishing Group,Nature Portfolio
• Subject: 631/378 / 631/477 / Adult / Brain research / Check lists / Checklist / Cognition - physiology / Cognitive ability / Cognitive assessment / Consensus / Delphi consensus / Delphi Technique / Environmental factors / Female / Human performance / Humanities and Social Sciences / Humans / Influence / Male / Medicine / multidisciplinary / Neuropsychological assessment / Perceptions / Psychiatry / Psychology / Questionnaires / Reproducibility of Results / Science / Science (multidisciplinary) / Situational factors / Substance use