Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Examining the responsible use of zero-shot AI approaches to scoring essays
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Examining the responsible use of zero-shot AI approaches to scoring essays
Do you wish to request the book?
Examining the responsible use of zero-shot AI approaches to scoring essays
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Examining the responsible use of zero-shot AI approaches to scoring essays
2024
Overview
The promise of AI to alleviate the burdens of grading and potentially enhance writing instruction is an exciting prospect. However, we believe it is crucial to emphasize that the accuracy of AI is only one component of its responsible use in education. Various governmental agencies, such as NIST in the US, and non-governmental agencies like the UN, UNESCO, and OECD have published guidance on the responsible use of AI, which we have synthesized to come up with our principles for the responsible use of AI in assessments at ETS. Our principles include fairness and bias mitigation; privacy & security; transparency, explainability, and accountability; educational impact & integrity; and continuous improvement. The accuracy of AI-scoring is one component of our principles related to educational impact & integrity. In this work, we share our thoughts on fairness & bias mitigation, and transparency & explainability. We demonstrate an empirical evaluation of zero-shot scoring using GTP-4o, with an emphasis on fairness evaluations and explainability of these automated scoring models.
