MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial
Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial
Journal Article

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for general anesthesia during cold knife conization: a single-center, randomized controlled trial

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Cold knife conization is usually performed under general anesthesia without intubation. This type of anesthesia is more critical in terms of the properties of the sedative drugs. Remimazolam is a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine in which the lipid bond can be rapidly hydrolyzed by nonspecific lipases in the plasma. Therefore, remimazolam can be used for general anesthesia without intubation in patients undergoing short procedures. In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of remimazolam with those of propofol for cold knife conization. Methods This single-center, randomized controlled trial screened 104 patients, and 90 were randomly assigned to receive propofol (P, N  = 45) or remimazolam (R, N  = 45) during cold knife conization. All the patients received a 1 µg/kg fentanyl injection. The patients received 1.5 mg/kg propofol or 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam injection, followed by a rate of 4 ~ 12 mg/kg/h or 1.0 ~ 3.0 mg/kg/h continuous intravenous infusion, respectively, to keep the patient state index (PSi) between 35 and 50. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic parameters, respiratory parameters, and other adverse events. Results The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia in the R group was significantly lower than that in the P group (46.7% vs. 71.1%, p  = 0.018). Compared with patients in the P group, patients in the R group had fewer changes in the respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure and heart rate at some time points during surgery. The incidences of hypotension (15.6% vs. 35.6%, p  = 0.030) and injection pain (42.2% vs. 84.4%, p  < 0.001) were lower in the R group than in the P group; however, patients in the R group required more time to awaken (7.9 ± 4.5 min vs. 4.3 ± 1.7 min, p  < 0.001). Conclusion In conclusion, patients in the R group had a lower incidence of hypoxemia and fewer hemodynamic changes than did patients in the P group. Thus, remimazolam can be safely used for unintubated general anesthesia in patients undergoing cold knife conization. Trial registration The trial registration number is ChiCTR2200065519.