Journal Article

Vaccine equity in low and middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Echeverria-Londono, Susy, Ali, Huda Ahmed, Hartner, Anna-Maria, Portnoy, Allison, Roth, Jeremy, Gaythorpe, Katy AM, Toor, Jaspreet, Li, Xiang, Woodruff, Kim, Ferguson, Neil M, Abbas, Kaja, Vynnycky, Emilia

2022

Overview

Background Evidence to date has shown that inequality in health, and vaccination coverage in particular, can have ramifications to wider society. However, whilst individual studies have sought to characterise these heterogeneities in immunisation coverage at national level, few have taken a broad and quantitative view of the contributing factors to heterogeneity in immunisation coverage and impact, i.e. the number of cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years averted. This systematic review aims to highlight these geographic, demographic, and sociodemographic characteristics through a qualitative and quantitative approach, vital to prioritise and optimise vaccination policies. Methods A systematic review of two databases (PubMed and Web of Science) was undertaken using search terms and keywords to identify studies examining factors on immunisation inequality and heterogeneity in vaccination coverage. Inclusion criteria were applied independently by two researchers. Studies including data on key characteristics of interest were further analysed through a meta-analysis to produce a pooled estimate of the risk ratio using a random effects model for that characteristic. Results One hundred and eight studies were included in this review. We found that inequalities in wealth, education, and geographic access can affect vaccine impact and vaccination dropout. We estimated those living in rural areas were not significantly different in terms of full vaccination status compared to urban areas but noted considerable heterogeneity between countries. We found that females were 3% (95%CI[1%, 5%]) less likely to be fully vaccinated than males. Additionally, we estimated that children whose mothers had no formal education were 27% (95%CI[16%,36%]) less likely to be fully vaccinated than those whose mother had primary level, or above, education. Finally, we found that individuals in the poorest wealth quintile were 27% (95%CI [16%,37%]) less likely to be fully vaccinated than those in the richest. Conclusions We found a nuanced picture of inequality in vaccination coverage and access with wealth disparity dominating, and likely driving, other disparities. This review highlights the complex landscape of inequity and further need to design vaccination strategies targeting missed subgroups to improve and recover vaccination coverage following the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration Prospero, CRD42021261927

• Publisher: BioMed Central,BioMed Central Ltd,Springer Nature B.V,BMC
• Subject: Child / Coronaviruses / COVID-19 / COVID-19 vaccines / Demographic aspects / Demographics / Developing Countries / Disease transmission / Economic aspects / Education / Equality and Human Rights / Equity / Female / Geography / Health care disparities / Health Policy / Health Promotion and Disease Prevention / Health Services Research / Heterogeneity / Humans / Hypotheses / Immunization / Inequality / LMIC / Low income groups / Male / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Meta-analysis / Methods / Mortality / Pandemics / Public Health / Qualitative analysis / Rural areas / Social Justice / Social Policy / Subgroups / Systematic Review / Urban areas / Vaccination / Vaccination Coverage / Vaccine / Vaccines