MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning
Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning
Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning
Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning
Journal Article

Randomized controlled trial of asynchronous vs. synchronous online teaching formats: equal knowledge after training, greater acceptance and lower intrinsic motivation through asynchronous online learning

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background The growing importance of online education in recent years has led to an increased focus on implementing and optimizing online learning formats. This study investigated how a lecture delivered in an asynchronous or synchronous online teaching format affects acceptance, intrinsic motivation and knowledge levels after training. The results can be used to optimize online education by identifying format-specific advantages and adapting them to learners’ needs. Methods All the Styrian paramedics ( N  = 5910) were invited to participate in the study and randomly assigned to one of two groups. A total of 1044 participants completed the trial, with one group receiving asynchronous training via a learning platform ( N  = 545) and the other group participating in synchronous training via webinars ( N  = 499) providing the same content. After completing a two-hour psychiatric emergency course, the participants were invited to complete a multiple-choice test and a survey assessing acceptance, preferences and intrinsic motivation. Linear regression, t tests and mediation analyses were conducted. Results The asynchronous training format was significantly more accepted ( p  <.001) and preferred overall. The participants’ preferences depended significantly on the type of learning format ( p  <.001). The synchronous learning format fostered greater intrinsic motivation ( p  =.001) and greater perceived autonomy ( p  <.001) but also a higher level of perceived pressure/tension ( p  =.003). The analysis revealed no significant difference in test results ( p  =.449) or perceived competence between the groups ( p  =.420). Furthermore, the difference in intrinsic motivation was fully mediated by perceived autonomy. Conclusions There are different advantages and disadvantages to providing a lecture via webinar or online learning platform. Both formats are equally effective in terms of knowledge levels after training, highlighting the importance of adapting teaching strategies to learners’ preferences.