MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study
Journal Article

Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Clinical reasoning skills are essential competencies for medical students; therefore, effective, evidence-informed teaching methodologies are needed worldwide. This study investigated the benefits of team-based learning (TBL) for developing the skills in medical students. Method A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was used to investigate the effectiveness of TBL for medical students acquiring clinical reasoning skills. The study participants comprised 92 fourth-year medical students at Yokohama City University School of Medicine, participating in TBL sessions that covered 10 major clinical symptoms identified in the core curriculum. Each session lasted 240 min. Before and after the educational intervention, student performance was measured using the script concordance test (SCT) on a 30-point scale, and self-assessed clinical reasoning competency was measured on a 7-point Likert scale. The SCT included pre-tests and post-tests of 30 questions each, with students randomly assigned to one of two test sets. Following the quantitative evaluation, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to explore the advantages of TBL for learning clinical reasoning skills. The analytic categories were set according to the six levels of Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning. Result Student performance improved significantly after the educational intervention (A test: 16.5 ± 4.4 to 18.7 ± 4.5, p  = 0.019; B test: 18.1 ± 3.7 to 19.8 ± 4.4, p  = 0.028). After the educational intervention, self-assessed clinical reasoning competency was significantly higher in “recalling appropriate physical examination and tests on clinical hypothesis generation,” “recalling appropriate differential diagnosis from patient’s chief complaint,” “verbalizing points that fit/don’t fit the recalled differential diagnosis appropriately,” “verbalizing and reflecting appropriately on own mistakes,” “selecting keywords from the whole aspect of the patient,” and “practicing the appropriate clinical reasoning process” (all p  < 0.001). The content analysis extracted 23 subcategories and 233 codes of the advantages of TBL for learning clinical reasoning skills, covering all six levels of Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning: Foundational knowledge (7 codes); Application (40 codes); Integration (69 codes); Human dimension (89 codes); Caring (8 codes); and Learning how to learn (20 codes). Conclusion This study demonstrates that TBL supports the acquisition of critical clinical reasoning skills among medical students.