Journal Article

Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations

Scheim, Ayden I., Dharma, Christoffer, Bauer, Greta R., Braimoh, Jessica

2017

Overview

Given that an estimated 0.6% of the U.S. population is transgender (trans) and that large health disparities for this population have been documented, government and research organizations are increasingly expanding measures of sex/gender to be trans inclusive. Options suggested for trans community surveys, such as expansive check-all-that-apply gender identity lists and write-in options that offer maximum flexibility, are generally not appropriate for broad population surveys. These require limited questions and a small number of categories for analysis. Limited evaluation has been undertaken of trans-inclusive population survey measures for sex/gender, including those currently in use. Using an internet survey and follow-up of 311 participants, and cognitive interviews from a maximum-diversity sub-sample (n = 79), we conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of two existing measures: a two-step question developed in the United States and a multidimensional measure developed in Canada. We found very low levels of item missingness, and no indicators of confusion on the part of cisgender (non-trans) participants for both measures. However, a majority of interview participants indicated problems with each question item set. Agreement between the two measures in assessment of gender identity was very high (K = 0.9081), but gender identity was a poor proxy for other dimensions of sex or gender among trans participants. Issues to inform measure development or adaptation that emerged from analysis included dimensions of sex/gender measured, whether non-binary identities were trans, Indigenous and cultural identities, proxy reporting, temporality concerns, and the inability of a single item to provide a valid measure of sex/gender. Based on this evaluation, we recommend that population surveys meant for multi-purpose analysis consider a new Multidimensional Sex/Gender Measure for testing that includes three simple items (one asked only of a small sub-group) to assess gender identity and lived gender, with optional additions. We provide considerations for adaptation of this measure to different contexts.

• Publisher: Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subject: Adaptation / Adolescent / Adolescents / Adult / Adults / Aged / Aggression / Analysis / Arches / Biology and Life Sciences / Birth / Canada / Cancer / Childbirth & labor / Cognitive ability / Color / Communities / Computer programs / Consortia / Data acquisition / Data analysis / Data collection / Data processing / Decision analysis / Dentistry / Disaggregation / Documentation / Documents / Editors / Epidemiology / Evaluation / Federal jurisdiction / Female / Gender / Gender aspects / Gender Identity / Health aspects / Health care / Health care disparities / Human behavior / Human rights / Humans / Internet / Inventories / Male / Mapping / Medicine / Methods / Middle Aged / Minority & ethnic groups / Mixed methods research / People and Places / pH effects / Politics / Polls & surveys / Population / Populations / Public health / Qualitative analysis / Questionnaires / Questions / Research and Analysis Methods / Rivers / Sex / Sexual behavior / Sexual Behavior - psychology / Sexuality / Social policy / Social Sciences / Software / Speech / Statistical analysis / Surveys and Questionnaires / Time measurement / Transgender people / Transgender persons / Transgender Persons - statistics & numerical data / Transsexualism - psychology / United States / Violence / Young Adult / Young adults