Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evidential Diversity and the Triangulation of Phenomena
by
Marchionni, Caterina
, Kuorikoski, Jaakko
in
Bias
/ Epistemology
/ Errors
/ Evidence
/ Evidentiality
/ Fallibility
/ Inference
/ Philosophy of science
/ Preferences
/ Triangulation
2016
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Evidential Diversity and the Triangulation of Phenomena
by
Marchionni, Caterina
, Kuorikoski, Jaakko
in
Bias
/ Epistemology
/ Errors
/ Evidence
/ Evidentiality
/ Fallibility
/ Inference
/ Philosophy of science
/ Preferences
/ Triangulation
2016
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evidential Diversity and the Triangulation of Phenomena
2016
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The article argues for the epistemic rationale of triangulation, namely, the use of multiple and independent sources of evidence. It claims that triangulation is to be understood as causal reasoning from data to phenomenon, and it rationalizes its epistemic value in terms of controlling for likely errors and biases of particular data-generating procedures. This perspective is employed to address objections against triangulation concerning the fallibility and scope of the inference, as well as problems of independence, incomparability, and discordance of evidence. The debate on the existence of social preferences is used as an illustrative case.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.