MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis
Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis
Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis
Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis
Journal Article

Long-term outcome (28–40 years) after correction of leg length discrepancy through permanent epiphysiodesis

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Permanent epiphysiodesis (pED) according to Phemister is an established treatment for leg length discrepancies (LLD) but has largely been replaced by less invasive techniques. Nevertheless, modern pED procedures based on the Phemister principle are still widely used in paediatric orthopaedics for LLD correction and treatment of tall stature. However, the long-term effects of pED on the knee joint remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of Phemister pED, specifically assessing secondary alterations in knee joint morphology and the incidence of pre-mature osteoarthritis. A clearer understanding of these sequelae may help guide treatment decisions in paediatric orthopaedic care. Materials and methods A retrospective review of our institution’s longitudinal database identified 75 patients who underwent Phemister pED for LLD between 1980 and 2006. Of these, 20 patients met inclusion criteria and were available for long-term evaluation. Their clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared with those of an age- and sex-matched control cohort of ten untreated individuals. Clinical and radiographic assessments included LLD, mechanical axis deviation, joint orientation angles, central knee anatomy and osteoarthritis grading. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D-3L and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results The median follow-up was 37 years (interquartile range 33–39). The mean pre-operative LLD of 2.8 cm (standard deviation (SD) 0.7) was reduced to 1.1 cm (SD 0.6) at last follow-up, although 55% of patients had residual LLD > 1 cm. No relevant differences in joint alignment or central knee anatomy were found between patients and controls. Mild knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren–Lawrence grade 1) was observed in two patients and none in controls. Patient-reported outcomes showed lower OKS and EQ-5D-3L scores in the pED group, although KOOS scores were similar. Conclusions Phemister pED showed satisfactory long-term results for LLD correction, without secondary angular or intra-articular deformities or relevant knee osteoarthritis. Despite slightly lower function and more discomfort, findings support the use of modern pED techniques based on the Phemister principle. This is especially relevant for elective indications such as tall stature. Further comparative studies with percutaneous methods remain necessary to confirm these observations. Level of evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.