MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment
Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment
Journal Article

Impact of AI-Assisted Diagnosis on American Patients’ Trust in and Intention to Seek Help From Health Care Professionals: Randomized, Web-Based Survey Experiment

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are increasingly integrated into medical practice, with AI-assisted diagnosis showing promise. However, patient acceptance of AI-assisted diagnosis, compared with human-only procedures, remains understudied, especially in the wake of generative AI advancements such as ChatGPT. This research examines patient preferences for doctors using AI assistance versus those relying solely on human expertise. It also studies demographic, social, and experiential factors influencing these preferences. We conducted a preregistered 4-group randomized survey experiment among a national sample representative of the US population on several demographic benchmarks (n=1762). Participants viewed identical doctor profiles, with varying AI usage descriptions: no AI mention (control, n=421), explicit nonuse (No AI, n=435), moderate use (Moderate AI, n=481), and extensive use (Extensive AI, n=425). Respondents reported their tendency to seek help, trust in the doctor as a person and a professional, knowledge of AI, frequency of using AI in their daily lives, demographics, and partisan identification. We analyzed the results with ordinary least squares regression (controlling for sociodemographic factors), mediation analysis, and moderation analysis. We also explored the moderating effect of past AI experiences on the tendency to seek help and trust in the doctor. Mentioning that the doctor uses AI to assist in diagnosis consistently decreased trust and intention to seek help. Trust and intention to seek help (measured with a 5-point Likert scale and coded as 0-1 with equal intervals in between) were highest when AI was explicitly absent (control group: mean 0.50; No AI group: mean 0.63) and lowest when AI was extensively used (Extensive AI group: mean 0.30; Moderate AI group: mean 0.34). A linear regression controlling for demographics suggested that the negative effect of AI assistance was significant with a large effect size (β=-.45, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.40, t1740=-20.81; P<.001). This pattern was consistent for trust in the doctor as a person (β=-.33, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.28, t1733=-14.41; P<.001) and as a professional (β=-.40, 95% CI -0.45 to -0.36, t1735=-18.54; P<.001). Results were consistent across age, gender, education, and partisanship, indicating a broad aversion to AI-assisted diagnosis. Moderation analyses suggested that the \"AI trust gap\" shrank as AI use frequency increased (interaction term: β=.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.13, t1735=4.06; P<.001) but expanded as self-reported knowledge increased (interaction term: β=-.04, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.00, t1736=-1.75; P=.08). Despite AI's growing role in medicine, patients still prefer human-only expertise, regardless of partisanship and demographics, underscoring the need for strategies to build trust in AI technologies in health care.