MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use
Journal Article

Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file systems after clinical use

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background Nickel titanium (NiTi) rotary files have drastically altered the treatment protocol in endodontics, allowing for faster and easier preparation and more thorough irrigation of the root canal system. Despite the advantages of the NiTi files, instrument separation still remains a major concern. The aim of this study was to compare the cyclic fatigue resistance of three different single-file NiTi systems after clinical use: WaveOne Gold (WOG, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), One Curve (OC, Micro Mega, Besancon, France), and Reciproc Blue (RPC Blue, VDW, Munich, Germany). Methods A total of 120 patients requiring endodontic treatment to first or second mandibular molars, were randomly divided into three groups (patient n  = 40) and root canals were prepared with WOG, OC or RPC Blue. Each group consists of 2 subgroups: first use (file n  = 10, patient n  = 10) and third use of file (file n  = 10, patient n  = 30). In control group, files were subjected to cyclic fatigue test without use (file n  = 10). Cyclic fatigue resistance of files was assessed by groove method. The data was evaluated by two-way ANOVA, Games & Howell post hoc and Weibull reliability analyses ( p  < .05). Results RPC Blue files showed the highest failure time value in all groups. In third use group, OC and RPC Blue files showed significantly higher failure time values compared to WOG files ( p  < .05). In general, RPC Blue files show the highest values in terms of number of cycles to fracture (NCF) in all groups, while OC and WOG files follow RPC Blue files respectively. There was statistically significant difference among groups considering the fragment length ( p  < .05). Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, RPC Blue files exhibited highest cyclic fatigue resistance after clinical use.