Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Diversity on the bench: An analysis of gendered biases in the language of Australian Family Law Court judgments
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Diversity on the bench: An analysis of gendered biases in the language of Australian Family Law Court judgments
Do you wish to request the book?
Diversity on the bench: An analysis of gendered biases in the language of Australian Family Law Court judgments
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Diversity on the bench: An analysis of gendered biases in the language of Australian Family Law Court judgments
2025
Overview
In this paper we analyse gender-based biases in the language within complex legal judgments. Our aims are: (i) to determine the extent to which purported biases discussed in the literature by feminist legal scholars are identifiable from the language of legal judgments themselves, and (ii) to uncover new forms of bias represented in the data that may promote further analysis and interpretation of the functioning of the legal system. We consider a large set of 2530 judgments in family law in Australia over a 20 year period, examining the way that male and female parties to a case are spoken to and about, by male and female judges, in relation to their capacity to provide care for children subject to the decision. Structural topic modelling is used to develop coherent topics for sentences that fall under the notion of “capacity”, which are further differentiated by the gender of both the target of the sentence and the gender of the judge. The analysis reveals significant gendered differences in the language used in these documents, determined by both the gender of the target and the gender of the judge.
